Happy Valentine’s Day! The big news this week was the Let’s Move campaign launched by the First Lady Mrs. Obama to fight the problem of childhood obesity in America. I think it is a worthwhile and timely initiative and I am glad that someone of her status is taking it on to give it the visibility it needs. While the cause is noble, the intentions are genuine and the star power is undeniable, I believe that the approach taken by her campaign is fundamentally flawed. I have serious doubts that it would create a change at the scale needed to make any real impact in the long term health of our nation.
I don’t normally consider myself a glass-half-empty-kinda guy. Yet, today I find myself compelled to give you 5 reasons why this initiative is destined to disappoint. I do sincerely hope I am wrong!
It will not change the demand for cheap fast food in any significant way
I admire Mrs. Obama’s candor in her acknowledgment that she found it hard to balance her family’s need for a healthful diet and demands of hers and Mr. Obama’s careers. Just too busy, not enough time…being unable to cook a good meal for my kids…going to fast food…ordering pizza. She certainly reflects the feelings of many Americans; however the ideas proposed under her first pillar, Healthy Choices, are simply too stale. Here is why:
- Empower customers by front-of-box labeling – interesting idea; already much talked about and being practiced, although not in a standardized way. I believe food marketers will eventually find a way around whatever regulations are introduced and customers will tune out the front-of-the-box information just the way they have tuned out the detailed and really informative nutrition facts label at the back.
- Prescription for healthier living – doctors and nurses will be encouraged to track body mass index and offer counseling for healthy eating early on. Nice thought – every time I go to the dentist, they tell me to floss daily. I don’t, even though I want to. I don’t even feel guilty about it anymore. I realize, they are just doing their job.
- Next generation food pyramid – Guess what, the USDA wants to revamp the food pyramid and online interactive tools! Great news for the academics. A busy parent is probably already overwhelmed; besides if they don’t find time to cook a good meal, do you really believe they will tinker around with online tools?
- Empowering change – very novel idea of a food atlas to show you food deserts around the country. If you live in one, watch out your property value may decline! Just kidding. Again, I think this is a gadget for the academic in us!
- Let’s move start up tools – so you need to stop watching TV and get out there and get some exercise! We all know that and no new tools are needed to convince us or help us out. There are plenty of them out there already.
The fundamentals remain unchanged – we live busy lives; we are always on-the-go; cheap fast food is readily available; it makes us feel good and solves a real problem. None of these ideas will change consumer habits in a fundamental way. At best, they will make people feel guilty, temporarily at least, but don’t expect them to change their habits.
It will not change how we farm and what we grow
What we grow is corn and beans – lots of them. We practice industrial agriculture which is dependent on fertilizers, pesticides, genetic modifications and consumes an unbelievable amount of natural resources. If you have doubts, pick up a book by Michael Pollan. We process meat in feedlots virtually shut-off to the outside world and raise cattle on a diet of corn. Chickens are no better and quality of seafood is getting worse; what with mercury contamination and salmon being raised on corn! We are constantly battling risks with food safety because of loopholes in inspections.
The wheel of supply and demand turns day and night, getting faster with each turn as the population grows and our appetite explodes. If demand does not change in a fundamental way, how can we expect supply to change? The so called organic movement and sustainable farming are like toddlers in the face of industrial farming.
Granted that one should not expect the First Lady to address such political hot buttons. But one should also not get too enamored by the marketing of this campaign to forget that our problems really arise out of the farm driven by consumer demand.
It offers no incentives for the food industry to innovate
I was excited to read:
Let’s Move is building communities by bringing together families, schools, private industry and government to make healthy living easier
I kept looking for what is expected of the private industry and the only example I found was how the beverage industry is answering the FDA’s call to post calorie information on the bottle! This is no innovation, only a marketing gimmick to appear responsible. There are no real drivers for the industry to innovate to produce healthful products. And believe me, the so called soda tax or twinkie tax is unlikely to effect this desired behavior.
Now you could argue about the definition of a healthful product. Surely, reducing sodium, trans fat and sugar is a step in the right direction. But the fact remains that these products do nothing to reduce the share of processed food in a typical American diet. In fact, this notion is contrary to the business model – after all, the food industry stays in business by selling more of their products, not less. I would love to see food companies create products (and services) that actually increase the share of home-cooked food in an average family. That would be real innovation.
It creates another food bureaucracy
A new Healthy Food Financing Initiative through a partnership between the departments of Treasury, Agriculture and Health & Human Services will invest $400 million each year to provide innovative financing to bring grocery stores to underserved areas. The idea is to increase access to healthy food, fruits and vegetables and to get rid of food deserts across the country. To me it smells like a new bureaucracy, unsustainable in the long run and at the risk of another budget cut. It addresses the issue of supply assuming that the demand will naturally be there. Really? Why not utilize the network of food banks and offer incentives to buy healthful products on food stamps? Do we really need a new system?
It will encourage schools to game the system
School administrators now have a new goal to accomplish – try to fit the mold of a healthier school with the Healthier Schools Challenge. The scorecard is simple – reduce salt, fat and sugar and increase whole grains. This is nutritionism at its best. It is probably not difficult to meet the standards – whatever they might be – over the 5-10 year-long time frame of the program. Does it mean that kids will start eating healthy? Maybe, but not a guarantee. With no real carrots and no sticks, my guess is that schools will simply game the system to generate a hype of healthfulness. And maybe they will figure out a way to correlate small drops in average body mass index with their efforts in the cafeteria! That will make it look really convincing – yeah, right!
I know, you are probably thinking that it is easy to be critical without offering an alternative. I agree – that is why I plan to write about a few out-of-the box ideas in future and invite a discussion on them. Stay tuned!
Enjoy and let me know what is on your mind.
Photo Source: baronsquirrel via flickr
©2010 Littlestomaks.com








